In a mark up of the Payments System Protection Act (H.R. 5767) in the House Committee on Financial Services on June 25, 2008, Rep. Bachus, citing research at McGill, claimed that one-third of college students who gambled online attempted suicide.

“This assertion, which is reportedly based upon our empirical research, is not predicated upon any factual evidence,” responded Derevensky in an interview with the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative. “None of the studies conducted with adolescents or college students, to the best of my knowledge, have looked at a connection between Internet wagering and suicide attempts.” Derevensky raised these same concerns in a letter sent last week to Reps. Bachus and Barney Frank (D-Mass.)

Derevensky believes there is an opportunity for Congress to better protect consumers in a regulated environment. “If Congress is serious about minimizing the threat posed by Internet gambling, it should look to create an environment where Internet gambling operators are required to put in place safeguards that protect against compulsive and underage gambling.”

Last week, a study conducted jointly by the University of Western Ontario and University of Nevada, Las Vegas called for the legalization and regulation of online gambling.

“Just as legalized commercial gambling in casinos allows for governments to regulate it, so, too, could the legalization of online gambling allow for better regulation and attempts to reduce the growth of problem gamblers,” said June Cotte, associate professor at the University of Western Ontario, as reported by Poker News.

Existing technology and security controls have already proven to be effective in addressing compulsive gambling. Safeguards currently available in the industry include the ability to control the amount of money wagered, set limits on amounts bet and amounts lost, restrict the duration that someone can play, identify and stop players whose gambling patterns seem out of the ordinary, and allow for consumers to be excluded from online gambling.

“It is disappointing that Rep. Bachus is using scare tactics and false claims in an attempt to justify why Congress should limit my ability to gamble online,” said Jeffrey Sandman, spokesman for the Safe and Secure Internet Gambling Initiative. “We are encouraged by the academic community’s support of Internet gambling regulation. They emphasize the important point that consumers will be better protected if there are safeguards put in place to combat underage and problem gambling.”

The Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act of 2007 (H.R. 2046), introduced by Rep. Frank, would establish an enforcement framework for licensed gambling operators to accept bets and wagers from individuals in the U.S. It includes a number of built-in consumer protections, including safeguards against compulsive and underage gambling, money laundering, fraud and identity theft. A companion piece of legislation that would ensure the collection of taxes on regulated Internet gambling activities, the Internet Gambling Regulation and Tax Enforcement Act of 2008 (H.R. 5523) was introduced by Congressman Jim McDermott (D-WA).

Additionally, Rep. McDermott introduced last week, the Investing in our Human Resources Act (H.R.6051), which would direct new revenue generated by regulated Internet gambling activities to be spent on job training for those in the declining sectors of the economy and educational assistance for foster care youth. The bill also includes provisions to encourage responsible Internet gambling behavior and an awareness of unsafe practices, something which has been praised by problem gambling advocates.

“Though I support the dedication of resources to raise awareness about problem gambling, I encourage Congress to also provide appropriate funding for research, treatment and the prevention of problem gambling,” added Derevensky.

Meanwhile, a new bill related to online gambling was introduced this week by U.S. Rep. James McDermott, D-Wash. H.R. 6501 amends the Social Security Act to establish a trust fund from the proceeds of taxing Internet gambling. The trust fund would be used to provide education, job training, public-transit subsidies and other services to individuals in foster care or in declining sectors of the economy. The bill was referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means and Committee on Education and Labor.

UIGEA, which bans gaming sites from accepting money transfers of any kind for bets deemed to be unlawful gambling, directs the U.S. Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve Board to create regulations that would require banks and processors to block payments to those sites.

Two critics of the UIGEA, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, senior committee member, on April 10 introduced H.R. 5767, which would have prohibited the Federal Reserve and Treasury Department from implementing the regulations called for in UIGEA. The bill was defeated in committee on June 25.

A bill offered as a substitute to H.R. 5767 also was defeated at the June 25 committee meeting. Dubbed the “Payments System Protection Act of 2008,” the bill would have prohibited implementation of UIGEA until the Treasury Secretary, the Federal Reserve, and the U.S. Attorney General jointly developed regulations defining the term “unlawful Internet gambling.” That bill was sponsored by Rep. Peter T. King, R-N.Y.

Banks, processors, the Fed, and the Treasury Department have said the regulations for implementing UIGEA are unworkable and will hurt the financial industry while having little impact on illegal online gambling (Digital Transactions News, April 21 and March 24). Critics say the regulations fail to define what constitutes unlawful Internet gambling, leaving it to each financial institution to reconcile conflicting state and federal laws and court decisions, as well as inconsistent Department of Justice interpretations, when determining whether to process a transaction. In addition, some of the information needed to determine whether a transaction is illegal is unavailable to banks.

It’s unclear how H.R. 6501, the bill that would tax Web-based gambling, would impact the UIGEA. McDermott did not return calls for comment. However, one UIGEA critic says the bill might gain more support than H.R. 5767 because taxes on gambling would be used for programs to help the disadvantaged.